Tags
Language
Tags
April 2024
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
https://canv.ai/
The picture is generated by canv.ai

We are excited to announce that Canv.ai now features a built-in translator, allowing you to communicate in your native language. You can write prompts in your language, and they will be automatically translated into English, facilitating communication and the exchange of ideas!

We value freedom of speech and guarantee the absence of censorship on Canv.ai. At the same time, we hope and believe in the high moral standards of our users, which will help maintain a respectful and constructive atmosphere.


👉 Check for yourself!

Resolution of Curve and Surface Singularities in Characteristic Zero

Posted By: AvaxGenius
Resolution of Curve and Surface Singularities in Characteristic Zero

Resolution of Curve and Surface Singularities in Characteristic Zero by K. Kiyek , J. L. Vicente
English | PDF | 2004 | 506 Pages | ISBN : 1402020287 | 50.3 MB

The Curves The Point of View of Max Noether Probably the oldest references to the problem of resolution of singularities are found in Max Noether's works on plane curves [cf. [148], [149]]. And probably the origin of the problem was to have a formula to compute the genus of a plane curve. The genus is the most useful birational invariant of a curve in classical projective geometry. It was long known that, for a plane curve of degree n having l m ordinary singular points with respective multiplicities ri, i E {1, . . . , m}, the genus p of the curve is given by the formula = (n - l)(n - 2) _ ~ "r. (r. _ 1) P 2 2 L. . ,. •• . Of course, the problem now arises: how to compute the genus of a plane curve having some non-ordinary singularities. This leads to the natural question: can we birationally transform any (singular) plane curve into another one having only ordinary singularities? The answer is positive. Let us give a flavor (without proofs) 2 on how Noether did it • To solve the problem, it is enough to consider a special kind of Cremona trans­ formations, namely quadratic transformations of the projective plane. Let ~ be a linear system of conics with three non-collinear base points r = {Ao, AI, A }, 2 and take a projective frame of the type {Ao, AI, A ; U}.